The truly incredible thing is that both services exist at all. A new age for democratized music production ![]() eMastered currently offers these at no charge, and that alone will be enough to swing some people for now.Īt some point, of course, eMastered will start charging although no plans have been announced yet. Even with the top plan, you’ll have to pay extra for high-quality 24-bit audio masters. Landr’s desktop appĮMastered is currently free to use, whereas Landr can cost up to $25 per month depending on how you want to use it. It’ll soon work with Native Instruments’ Stems format to help musicians make ‘remixable’ versions of their songs for DJs, too. ![]() Landr also offers a desktop app for Mac to integrate better with your production workflow, and as of today a new algorithm is available specifically for making DJ mixes sound better. While it takes longer to produce a final master, it gives you three different loudness options compared to eMastered’s one. Initial tests leave me feeling that eMastered has a slightly ‘sweeter’ sound, but as I say – entirely subjective.Īnother thing to consider is that Landr is a more mature product, so it has more features and options. However, really it’s down to your own ears and tastes as to what you prefer. In terms of the quality of the master you get back, the comparison is entirely subjective – they both make your music louder and make tweaks to the sound to boost the bass, emphasise the vocals or whatever else the algorithms determine needs to be done. ![]() How do eMastered and Landr work in comparison? I tried both on music I’d produced myself and found eMastered to be faster, with songs processed and available for download in under a minute versus Landr’s two minutes or so for a download to be sent by email. EMastered promotional demo video eMastered vs Landr
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |